Web Fame Sucks

To date I've not authorized my work or my image to be used anywhere outside my one YouTube account or my one Google account. To date I've received no compensation for works of mine which were used commercially. When they try to make you think that my glory is in the past, it must leave some with the illusion that I actually had glory in the past. I did not. The glory for my work was soaked up by others in the act of committing fraud. I'm just an internet star. I've never been more than an internet star. And that's unimpressive because anyone can be an internet star. Only the select few are chosen for glorious careers as stars of television and radio. Who chooses them? My guess is people like Jay Leno. And do they tell you I'm boring now? At least I can keep my readers entertained without plagiarizing like they do. And that's because it's so exciting for them to be at parties telling each other how great they are instead of doing their boring jobs and writing their own scripts. A play-by-play account of any suffering person is likely to be uneventful. Take gulag prisoners: they lived a life of constant drudgery and suffocating regiment. But their stories help readers to cherish freedom. And workers may feel more secure about being employed when they read about the privations of unemployment. But I think I do a fair job within this constricted environment. I make up for the bleak reality with wordplay and imagination. And it's too bad these superstars couldn't be interesting enough to do this for themselves before they started throwing glamour parties. I'm opening up a new blog today to help keep my massive musical repertoire organized. Along the way to accomplishing this, I've come up with a question. Why are my music videos streamed in with non-music videos? Are so-called related videos used to diminish my music?
Arguments Copyright Issues Comedy Sketches Cartoons Lyrics Poems
More Statements Scripts Songs
© 2013. Statements by David Skerkowski. All rights reserved.